Five stages exist in criminal cases: 1) pre-trial discovery and motions; 2) resolution via trial or plea of guilty/ no contest; 3) sentencing; 4) direct appeal; 5) collateral attack using post-conviction motions. Once a defendant is convicted and sentenced there are still a myriad of options available to a defendant to reduce or reverse his or her conviction or sentence. One’s fight for freedom does not end at sentencing. In many criminal cases, the appellate and post-conviction process takes longer to resolve than the time from when a defendant is charged until he is sentenced.

The criminal appellate and post-conviction process is an extremely nuanced, complicated process which is strictly regulated by an extensive body of caselaw and rules of procedure. There exists a highly disjointed patchwork of rules and cases which require extensive experience and knowledge to grasp as a cohesive framework. There are many ways in which a court can commit error subject to reversal on appeal and most of these errors may not be obvious to a normal person. The Miami appeals lawyers at Xander Law Group can assist you in determining whether an error may have occurred in your case which is subject to remedy on appeal or by post-conviction motion.

Strict deadlines apply and each available remedy must be exercised in a specific order and within specific time frames or else a defendant’s right to make certain claims and assertions of error are forever waived. The nature of a defendant’s claimed error must be specifically analyzed by a competent post-conviction or appellate attorney to determine which rule of procedure permits such advancement of the argument. A common mistake of criminal defendants convicted of a crime is to focus on the facts of the claimed error and to ignore the procedural and legal nuances that are also relevant to their claim. In failing to meet a deadline or to invoke the proper rule or even subsection of a rule, a defendant may waive his claim or have it dismissed. Any subsequent attempt to bring the same factual or legal claim in a future motion will likely be denied as impermissibly successive even though the first motion was not filed properly nor adjudicated on the merits.

A defendant who proceeds to trial and is convicted is afforded more opportunities to attack his conviction and sentence than a defendant who pleads guilty or no contest. This is because a defendant who pleads guilty or no contest is not entitled to attack his conviction on direct appeal because any such appeal is waived by entry of a plea. Only alleged sentencing errors or pre-trial rulings reserved for appeal are permitted to be raised on direct appeal in such an instance. In comparison, a defendant who proceeds to trial can appeal any errors or factual findings that are preserved by objection pre-trial, at trial, or during sentencing.

 

Sample of Prior Cases and Results in Criminal Appellate and Post-Conviction Matters

Attempted Murder Conviction Vacated

Our client was convicted of attempted first degree murder following jury trial in Hillsborough County and sentenced to 30 years in prison with a 25 year minimum mandatory sentence. The attorneys at Xander Law Group interviewed a person of interest in Mexico who claimed responsibility for the shooting that our client was wrongfully sentenced for committing. The result was that the sentence was vacated.

Sentence Reduced in Drug Trafficking Case

Defendant convicted of selling drugs to a confidential informant from inside an apartment and sentenced to ten years in prison. The appellate team at Xander Law group filed a motion for post-conviction relief alleging that defense counsel at trial rendered ineffective assistance of counsel in failing to move for disclosure of the confidential informant prior to trial and an affidavit was produced from the defendant’s mother’s ex-boyfriend who accepted responsibility for the crime. Based on an agreement with the prosecution the sentence was reduced by three years.

Vacated Open Plea of Thirty Years Prison Based on Ineffective Assistance of Counsel

A young man in his early 20’s was convicted of spraying graffiti on a public water tower while in possession of marijuana. While serving a term of probation for this offense he was charged in a new case for arming himself with a pair of scissors during a confrontation. His attorney advised him to plea to the court without any guarantee of sentence and the defendant received a 30 year sentence. Our attorneys filed an ineffective assistance of counsel motion based on the lawyer’s misadvice to his client and for failing to present mitigating evidence. The sentence was reduced to ten years.

Ineffective Assistance of Counsel for Failing to Present Favorable Witness at Sentencing

A contested issue at sentencing in this case was whether our client was the gunman in a robbery or a passive participant waiting in a vehicle. A co-defendant was willing to clarify that our client was not the gunman but his defense lawyer told him that was not possible. We filed an ineffective assistance of counsel motion and lowered the four year sentence to three years.

Multiple Life Sentences Vacated Based on Agreement with Prosecution

Our client was sentenced to multiple consecutive life sentences following a trial and probation violation hearing in which he was charged with armed robbery of multiple victims and burglary. This was one of at least a half dozen felony convictions for this client. We filed a motion alleging ineffective assistance of counsel and reached a negotiated resolution with the prosecution that resulted in vacating the sentences and our client was released from prison.

Reduction of Life Sentences for Murder

A man convicted for multiple homicides in the early 1990’s recently approached Xander Law Group’s appellate counsel for an opinion on attacking his multiple life sentences after the former prosecutor, now a judge, failed to follow correct procedures and manipulated the court to enhance the defendant’s sentence.  After nearly 20 years of incarceration the defendant was released due to post-conviction motions filed by the firm.

Ineffective Assistance of Counsel in Drug Trafficking Conviction

The defendant in a drug trafficking case in Highlands County sought to prove that his attorney rendered ineffective assistance of counsel when he failed to interview potential witnesses and investigate a potential unlawful search of his residence by law enforcement.  The firm filed a Rule 3.850 motion alleging ineffective assistance of counsel and seeking to vacate the judgment and sentence.  The firm was successful in vacating the defendant’s sentence and obtaining a lower punishment.

Evidence Suppressed and Charges Dropped in Marijuana Grow House Case

An attorney defending a rural marijuana grow house case in Ocala approached the firm for assistance in drafting a motion to suppress evidence obtained based on an unconstitutional search and seizure of evidence where the law enforcement officers entered the home without a warrant and located hundreds of marijuana plants while seeking to invoke the protective sweep exception to the Fourth Amendment.  A judge granted the motion to suppress authored by the firm and dismissed the charges against the defendants because the prosecution obtained their evidence in violation of the defendants’ constitutional rights.

Conviction Vacated for Haitian Defendant Subject to Deportation

Accepting a plea in a criminal case often subjects the defendant to deportation.  In a Miami-Dade aggravated battery case the firm was successful in utilizing a common law writ which is rarely invoked to overturn a decade-old conviction which resulted in an order of deportation in immigration proceedings.  The firm argued that it would be inequitable to deport the defendant to Haiti in the aftermath of the tragic earthquake which victimized that country.  The court agreed and the defendant’s order of deportation was ultimately lifted as a result of the firm’s success in his criminal case.

Created Law Prohibiting a Judge from Considering Race or National Origin When Imposing Sentence

At both the federal and state levels the firm has argued that courts may not consider a defendant’s race or national origin as a negative factor when imposing a sentence.  In a Jacksonville case the defendant, a prominent local medical doctor, accepted a plea of guilty to a felony offense.  The sentencing judge referenced the defendant’s Muslim religion and middle-eastern origin in a negative fashion just prior to imposing consecutive maximum sentences.  On appeal the firm was able to obtain a reversal and created new law in Florida which prohibits a sentencing court from considering a person’s race, religion, or national origin when imposing sentence.  The defendant was ultimately released after his sentence was reduced.  The firm raised this same argument in a federal case in Chicago at the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals and was victorious there for the same reasons.

Conviction and Sentence Vacated on Appeal for Violating Defendant’s Right to Confront Witness

Just prior to trial in a drug trafficking case the co-defendant accepted a plea of guilty in exchange for his agreement to cooperate with the prosecution.  The defense requested a continuance so the defendant could prepare for trial by interviewing the co-defendant in a deposition.  The judge ordered the defendant to proceed to trial without any knowledge of the co-defendant’s damaging testimony and the prosecution obtained a conviction.  The firm represented the defendant on appeal and obtained a new trial.  The defendant, a prominent DJ in Mexico, was released upon remand to the trial court.

Habeas Corpus Granted for Unlawful Detention of Defendant Awaiting Trial

After being released on pre-trial bond conditions a defendant was 15 minutes late to court for a routine status hearing was taken in to custody by a Miami-Dade County judge based solely on the basis that he was late to court.  The firm filed a habeas corpus petition in the appellate court the same day the defendant was jailed.  The appellate court ordered the defendant released from custody.

Newly Discovered Evidence Exonerates Accused Sex Offender

Nearly two decades after being coerced to lie by their mother, two adult sisters came forward to exonerate their stepfather of false accusations of molestation. Following an evidentiary hearing in the matter the trial court denied the motion for post-conviction relief. The attorneys at Xander Law Group succeeded on appeal and reversed the trial court’s order. The charges were ultimately dropped.

 

Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.800 (c)- Motion to Reduce Sentence

The first opportunity a defendant convicted and sentenced for a crime has to request relief is provided for in Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800 (c), which permits a defendant to motion the trial court for mitigation of sentence within 60 days of imposition of sentence or within 60 days of issuance of a mandate by the appellate court after a direct appeal. The mandate of an appellate court is the formal conclusion and findings of the court after the time for motions for rehearing or rehearing en banc have concluded subsequent to the entry of the court’s opinion. Such motions are filed with the trial court that previously sentenced the defendant and request a reduction in sentence for any compelling reason advanced by the defendant. Some examples of compelling grounds for a reduction in sentence include mitigating factors not previously considered by the court, evidence not previously considered which weakens the prosecution’s case, post-sentencing cooperation efforts of the defendant, health considerations, recantations of witnesses, pregnancy of a loved one, and sympathetic victim statements in support of the defendant.

 

Florida Criminal Appeals

Defendants who have proceeded to trial in a misdemeanor case are permitted to pursue an appeal to the circuit court in which the county court resides. These appeals are fairly rare because of the relatively short sentences of misdemeanor cases which are typically served before an appeal is even resolved.

Felony cases are tried in the circuit court and are appealed to one of Florida’s five district courts of appeal. A defendant only has thirty days from the date sentence is imposed to file a formal notice of appeal sufficiently describing the nature of the appeal and the appellate court with jurisdiction to consider the case. A filing fee is due at the time of filing. The notice of appeal is jurisdictional, which means that if the filing deadline is missed for any reason the appellate court forever loses jurisdiction to consider the defendant’s appeal. There exists an exception where a defendant informs his counsel of his desire to appeal and directs counsel to file a notice of appeal but counsel neglects to do so through no fault of the defendant. In such instances, an evidentiary hearing is required in the trial court to determine if the defendant can meet his burden of illustrating that he instructed counsel of his timely desire to appeal. If you believe that may have missed your filing deadline due to negligence of counsel please contact the attorneys at Xander Law Group promptly for an evaluation of your rights and remedies.

Criminal appeals of trial court convictions are less focused on the innocence or guilt of a defendant than they are on whether the court committed errors in admitting evidence, permitting unqualified jurors to serve, improperly dismissing qualified jurors from service, disqualifying evidence that should have been admitted, permitting improper remarks by prosecutors, permitting expert witnesses to testify who are not adequately qualified to render an expert opinion, failing to recognize qualified expert witnesses as such and improperly excluding their expert opinion, permitting the prosecution to shift the burden of proof on the accused, failing to exclude evidence which was not properly disclosed by the prosecution, improper rulings on motions, improper jury instructions and countless other legal errors recognized under the law.

A well-written appellate brief contains a concise explanation of the procedural and factual history of the case, provides an accurate recitation of the evidence and testimony from trial, cites to valid legal authority, and persuasively argues why the appellate court should rule in a party’s favor. Effective appellate advocacy is an art form which requires a unique skillset and experience which is completely different from that of trial court litigation. The attorneys at Xander Law Group possess the experience and talent necessary to provide quality representation on appeal defendants seeking to overturn their conviction or reduce their sentence.

Criminal defendants are given a unique opportunity on appeal to submit the first and final arguments on appeal. In all criminal appeals the defendant must submit an initial brief on the merits through counsel which provides the appellate court with a concise, persuasive argument as to why the trial court committed reversible error(s). The prosecution, through the Office of the Attorney General, submits an answer brief seeking to contest the assertions of error made by the defense. The Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure permit the defendant to submit a reply brief rebutting the counterarguments of the prosecution. Reply briefs are discretionary in nature. Unfortunately, many attorneys do not routinely submit reply briefs for their clients. At Xander Law Group we always inform our clients of their right to have a reply brief submitted on their behalf and assist them in making an informed decision was to whether to waive this right. It is critical to retain counsel that will inform you of this right and involve you in the process.

Although the appellate process is almost entirely advanced by written arguments and citations to legal authority, the parties to an appeal have the right under the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure to request oral arguments before the appellate court. Oral arguments are an opportunity to appear before the panel of appellate judges and engage in advocacy of the defendant’s positions while answering critical questions posed by the judges. This is a unique opportunity to persuade judges that might have otherwise ruled against the defendant. At Xander Law Group we always advise our clients of the right to request oral arguments and advise our clients as to whether oral arguments should be requested based on the specific intricacies of their case. In almost all instances we advise our clients to request oral arguments and the Miami appeal attorneys at Xander Law Group have had a high degree of prior success in obtaining oral arguments which are not routinely granted in most cases.

 

Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(d) – Ineffective Assistance of Appellate Counsel

The Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution grants all people the right to counsel in a criminal prosecution. The United States Supreme Court has held that this right necessarily entitles to represented persons accused of crimes the right to effective assistance of counsel. While ineffective assistance of counsel claims are traditionally discussed in the context of errors and omissions by trial counsel, the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure recognize a mechanism for defendants to assert claims to an appellate court that denied them relief if their appellate counsel was ineffective for failing to advance an argument that would have entitled a defendant to relief.

This is one of the most under-utilized post-conviction mechanisms available in Florida. This essentially permits a person who has been convicted and who has had their conviction affirmed on appeal to seek a second opinion to determine if their appellate lawyer rendered ineffective assistance of counsel in failing to include a meritorious argument on direct appeal. The South Florida appeal attorneys at Xander Law Group can assist you in evaluating your case anywhere in Florida to determine if you have a valid ineffective assistance of appellate counsel claim. Strict deadlines apply in these cases and it is important to consult counsel with a sense of urgency or you may forever waive your opportunity to make an ineffective assistance of appellate counsel claim in a Florida court.

The appellate attorneys at Xander Law Group have experience in representing clients in ineffective assistance of appellate counsel cases throughout the state of Florida and can assist in determining if you or someone you know has a viable claim.

 

Fla. R. Crim. P. 3850 – Ineffective Assistance of Defense Counsel at Trial

The Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution grants all people the right to counsel in a criminal prosecution. The United States Supreme Court has held that this right necessarily entitles to represented persons accused of crimes the right to effective assistance of counsel. In 1984, the United States Supreme Court decided the landmark case of Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984) holding that a criminal defendant has the right of effective assistance of counsel and establishing a test to determine if a defendant is entitled to relief from errors or omissions of counsel that depart from the minimum acceptable standard of effective representation.

The Strickland court established a two prong test to determine if a defendant is entitled to relief based on a Sixth Amendment violation predicated upon the deprivation of the effective assistance of counsel: 1) counsel’s performance fell below and objective standard of reasonableness and; 2)the deficient performance of counsel gives rise to a reasonable probability that if counsel had performed adequately the result would have been different.

The first prong of the Strickland test requires a criminal defendant to show that counsel’s actions or omissions were “deficient” to the extent that counsel’s failures were “so serious that counsel was not functioning as the ‘counsel’ guaranteed the defendant by the Sixth Amendment.”

The second prong of the Strickland test is commonly referred to as the prejudice prong because a defendant seeking to establish an ineffective assistance of counsel claim must illustrate not just that counsel’s error or omission was unreasonable, but also that this changed the outcome of the case to the defendant’s detriment. For example, if a defendant is charged with armed robbery of a convenience store and he leaves behind his photo identification and DNA evidence on a water bottle, is captured clearly on surveillance camera and is identified by a store full of patrons and workers, it would be folly to assert that counsel was ineffective for failing to investigate an alibi witness who would testify that the defendant was at home watching a movie during the commission of the robbery because there is overwhelming evidence of guilt establishing that the defendant committed the crime. In such an instance, a court would almost certainly find that the outcome of the proceedings would not have been different because any reasonable jury still would have found the defendant guilty.

Adequately meeting the Strickland standard is extremely difficult because courts give deference to counsel’s actions if they were strategically motivated or the result of a reasoned judgement call. Meeting the Strickland standard requires meeting both prongs to succeed, both independent and collectively. Experience and a detailed understanding of the law are necessary to craft a viable ineffective assistance of counsel claim that will not be denied on its face as legally insufficient.

Once an ineffective assistance of counsel claim is filed in the trial court, the judge must make a determination if the motion is facially sufficient. There are a number of ways that a motion can be stricken or denied without any further action because it does not meet applicable legal standards. If a motion is deemed facially sufficient and not plainly refuted by the record, then the trial court will often require the prosecution to file a written response. The written response by the prosecution will attempt to find legal deficiencies in the motion or to attack the veracity of the claims on the merits. Some common legal deficiencies are claims that are prohibited because they should have been raised on direct appeal, claims that were already denied on direct appeal, motions filed outside of the applicable deadline, failure of the defendant to swear to the motion under penalty of perjury, and claims that have been raised before and denied already. Attacks on the merits seek to use the law and prior events or statements made in the case to show why the defendant is not entitled to relief.

This is a critical juncture in the post-conviction process because a good post-conviction lawyer will attempt to negotiate with the prosecution to reach an agreement for a reduced sentence. The attorneys at Xander Law Group have resolved more post-conviction motions by negotiating with prosecutors than by asking for a ruling from the court. This is critical because a defendant who is incarcerated and does not retain counsel does not have the opportunity to negotiate with a prosecutor.

The defense is permitted to file a written reply once the prosecution files a response to the defendant’s motion for post-conviction relief. This is a critical function because the law affords a defendant the last word. A seasoned post-conviction attorney will review the state’s arguments with his or her client and formulate a rebuttal to the prosecution’s arguments. At Xander Law Group we pride ourselves on always involving our clients in this process.

At the conclusion of the submission of all written arguments the court makes a determination as to whether the defendant is entitled to an evidentiary hearing. This is a hearing in which the defense and prosecution are entitled to call witnesses and submit evidence in support of their positions. Often times, if an evidentiary hearing is ordered the defense is in an excellent position to have meaningful negotiations with the prosecution for a reduced sentence by way of agreement. The law requires that an evidentiary hearing be conducted if the defendant submits a facially sufficient motion which is not refuted by the record and which presents a claim that may entitle the defendant to relief if he can prove his claims. With some limited exceptions, the relief granted by the court if a defendant wins an evidentiary hearing is to vacate the conviction. This essentially places the position in the same place he was immediately after the original arrest and the state will either have to offer a plea bargain or prove their case again at trial. If significant time has passed it may be difficult for the prosecution to meet their burden at a second trial.

Post-conviction relief is also available to defendants who pled guilty or no contest. These claims are limited and require a defendant to prove several more factors than if they had proceeded to trial. The experienced post-conviction attorneys at Xander Law Group can consult with you to determine if these factors can be met in your case.

Perhaps the single most important aspect to post-conviction practice is the timely preservation and submission of claims. There is a statutory jurisdictional deadline that applies to Rule 3.850 motions for post-conviction relief. The applicable deadline is two years from when the defendant’s conviction becomes final. A conviction becomes final when his or her appeal is denied and the time for filing for certiorari relief to the Florida Supreme Court ends or, if no appeal is taken, when the time for filing an appeal ends. It does not matter how compelling of a claim a defendant has if he does not file within the deadline because a court has no authority under the law to hear a claim that is time barred.

Certain exceptions apply. For example, if an attorney is retained for post-conviction purposes prior to the expiration of the filing deadline and the attorney misses the deadline the client may still be able to file their claims upon successfully illustrating that the only reason for missing the deadline was counsel’s negligence.

Contact the Florida post-conviction attorneys at Xander Law Group for a free consultation to see if we can you assist in obtaining post-conviction relief.

 

Sample of Grounds Leading to Legally Recognized Claims for Ineffective Assistance of Counsel

• Counsel failed to call a favorable witness at trial
• Counsel failed to investigate a potential witness
• Counsel failed to request favorable jury instructions
• Counsel failed to object to unfavorable jury instructions
• Counsel misadvised as to the maximum penalty
• Counsel failed to convey a plea offer
• Counsel failed to file a motion to suppress evidence or statements
• Counsel failed to depose witnesses
• Counsel failed to advise of immigration/ deportation consequences
• Counsel failed to investigate mitigating evidence for trial
• Counsel failed to investigate mitigating evidence for sentencing
• Counsel had a conflict of interest
• Counsel failed to object to erroneous sentencing score sheet
• Counsel misadvised or failed to inform regarding a waiver of rights
• Counsel failed to advise that if a defendant chooses to testify the prosecution may introduce prior criminal convictions
• Counsel failed to advise of applicable minimum mandatory sentences
• Counsel failed to investigate an alibi defense
• Counsel failed to preserve evidence
• Counsel failed to inspect physical evidence, such as weight of drugs in a narcotics case
• Counsel failed to research impeachment material for adverse witnesses
• Counsel failed to object to adverse expert witness testimony
• Counsel failed to obtain expert witnesses
• Counsel failed to file a stand your ground self-defense motion
• Counsel invited error
• Counsel failed to preserve appellate review with appropriate objections
• Counsel failed to object to improper burden shifting
• Counsel failed to object to improper statements by the prosecution during opening statements
• Counsel failed to object to improper statements by the prosecution during closing arguments
• Counsel failed to object to juror misconduct
• Counsel failed to object to improper dismissal of jurors
• Counsel failed to object to prosecution’s failure to establish venue and jurisdiction
• Counsel failed to object to expired statute of limitations
• Counsel failed to object to unconstitutional statute or rule

 

Appeals from Denial of Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Claims

Florida courts have two options when denying a motion for post-conviction relief: 1) a denial based on the face of the record or for failure to state a claim the law recognizes without the need of conducting an evidentiary hearing; or 2) a denial after having considered evidence and testimony at an evidentiary hearing.

The law requires a judge to hold an evidentiary hearing when a post-conviction claim is not refuted by the record and which may be substantiated with available witness testimony or through the introduction of evidence.  One of the most common failures in the criminal justice system is the failure of judges to hold evidentiary hearings when necessary. Fortunately, the appellate courts have a review process for when a claim is improperly denied without an evidentiary hearing. This process is not automatic and must be initiated typically within 30 days.

In cases in which an evidentiary hearing was conducted and the defendant’s motion was denied after the court considered evidence and testimony, the defendant can appeal the court’s determinations of fact and conclusions of law. This process must be initiated with a notice of appeal timely filed to the proper district court of appeal. The proceedings are essentially identical to those in a direct appeal, except that the subject matter of the proceedings is confined to the court’s ruling on the defendant’s post-conviction motion.

The post-conviction attorneys at Xander Law Group have extensive experience in representing clients on appeal from post-conviction denials by the trial court. Please contact us for a free consultation if you are seeking representation regarding appealing the denial of a Florida post-conviction motion in a criminal case.

 

Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.800- Correction of Illegal Sentences

In Florida, the law allows an illegal sentence to be attacked at any time. Illegal sentences are categorized as such because of a fundamental legal error and are never based on facts related to a defendant’s guilt or innocence.

Some examples of illegal sentences that Florida law recognizes are:

• A sentence imposed by a court without jurisdiction. Some reasons why a court may lack jurisdiction is that there is no geographical nexus to the alleged crime, the defendant was previously tried and thus a double jeopardy violation exists, or the statute of limitations expired.
• A sentence in excess of the statutory maximum.
• An ambiguous sentence.
• Upward departures from previously entered sentences with no valid legal basis.
• A written sentence that is inconsistent with a judge’s oral pronouncement in open court. Where there is ambiguity between a sentence announced in court at a sentencing hearing and a written sentence, the oral sentence controls.
• A sentence that does not comply with what is bargained for in a plea bargain.

An evidentiary hearing is not permitted in an action alleging an illegal sentence. If a motion to correct an illegal sentence is denied this ruling can be appealed to the appropriate district of appeal within the applicable time limit.

The attorneys at Xander Law Group have extensive experience in representing clients before both trial and appellate courts on motions to correct illegal sentences. Our attorneys have successfully vacated numerous sentences for lack of jurisdiction or other reasons. Please contact us for a free consultation to see if we can assist you in correcting or vacating an illegal sentence.

 

Newly Discovered Evidence

Florida law defines newly discovered evidence as evidence that could not have been discovered with the exercise of due diligence by defense counsel or the defendant at the time of trial.

This is legally and logically distinct from ineffective assistance of counsel claims where an attorney fails to investigate a witness’s potential testimony or fails to call a witness at trial.

For example, if a witness were to change their testimony years after being deposed or interviewed in a case this could be newly discovered evidence which would afford the accused a new trial and vacate a previously entered guilty plea, if applicable. Also, if a person came forward claiming responsibility for the crime and professing the accused’s innocence, this can also qualify as newly discovered evidence.

Claims for newly discovered evidence must be made within two years of discovering the evidence or they will be forever waived. For a court to be able to award relief to a defendant seeking a new trial based on newly discovered evidence the defendant must adequately illustrate how the evidence or testimony in question would call the accused’s guilt in question so that the outcome of the proceedings might be different with the inclusion of the newly discovered evidence.

The attorneys at Xander Law Group have extensive experience in representing clients before both trial and appellate courts in newly discovered evidence cases. Our attorneys have successfully vacated numerous sentences based on newly discovered evidence. Please contact us for a free consultation to see if we can assist you in advancing a newly discovered evidence claim.

 

28 U.S.C. § 2254- Federal Court Review of State Conviction

Federal law provides a remedy for state court prisoner seeking review of the denial of their state post-conviction motions. In order to do so, a defendant must exhaust all state court remedies prior to petitioning for federal court review.

The deadline imposed by the federal court is the same for prisoners in every state. An unintended consequence of this rule is that the one year jurisdictional deadline imposed by the federal courts is only half of the two year deadline imposed by Florida in Rule 3.850. Thus, it is possible for a defendant to timely petition Florida courts for relief and then upon being denied to have already missed the deadline for federal court review. This is an extremely common occurrence that can be prevented by consulting an experienced post-conviction lawyer early after being convicted and sentenced.

The attorneys at Xander Law Group can assist you in seeking to remedy your Florida state court conviction in federal court. Contact us for a free consultation.

 

International Prisoner Treaty Transfers

The United States is a member to several treaties which permit citizens convicted in a foreign country to be returned to their home country to carry out their sentence. Foreign nationals convicted of crimes in the United States can apply to their home country for an international treaty transfer in which they can serve their sentence in their country of citizenship.

A benefit to international treaty transfers is that the receiving country is not bound by the sentence imposed in the United States. A more severe sentence may not be imposed but a more lenient sentence may be imposed. In effect, an international treaty transfer may be a mechanism to reduce a prisoner’s sentence.

Countries With Which the United States Has an International Prisoner Transfer Treaty

Albania	Germany	Nicaragua
Andorra	Greece	Norway
Argentina	Guatemala	Palau
Armenia	Honduras	Panama
Australia	Hong Kong	Paraguay
Austria	Hungary	Peru
Azerbaijan	Iceland	Poland
Bahamas	India	Portugal
Belgium	Ireland	Romania
Belize	Israel	Russia
Bermuda	Italy	San Marino
Bolivia	Japan	Saudi Arabia
Bosnia and Herzegovina	Kazakhstan	Serbia
Brazil	Korea, Republic of	Slovakia
Bulgaria	Latvia	Slovenia
Canada	Liechtenstein	Spain
Chile	Lithuania	Suriname
Costa Rica	Luxemborg	Sweden
Croatia	Macedonia, Republic of	Switzerland
Cyprus	Malta	Thailand
Czech Republic	Marshall Islands	Tonga
Denmark	Mauritius	Trinidad/Tobaga
Ecuador	Mexico	Turkey
El Salvador	Micronesia	Ukraine
Estonia	Moldova	United Kingdom*
Finland	Mongolia	Uruguay
France	Montenegro	Venezuela
Georgia	Netherlands (Including Aruba, Curacao, Sint Maarten, Curaçao, Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba)

 

Please contact the attorneys at Xander Law Group if you are interested in learning more about international prisoner treaty transfers.